U.N. Endorses Iranian Nuclear Deal

  1. Share
4 5

For the world, this was just another day of world politics.

For the United States, this was just another thumbing of the nose at the U.S. Constitution.

For the life of me, I can’t understand how we have allowed this to go on this long. For a lot of people in our nation, the Constitution is that strange thing radical, right wing fanatics keep dredging up, but, for them, it is just some dusty old document that…well who really cares about anyway?

In the proper perspective, the U.S. Constitution is the binding contract under which the States created the Federal Government, and under which the Federal Government is supposed to abide. It is The Law and The Rule of the United States…that’s all.

But, when governments are allowed to become powerful, unassailably powerful, they not only have an insatiable lust for more, but they are disdainful of anything that would dare limit or curtail that power or its growth. 

That, of course, is exactly what the U.S. Constitution was all about. The greatest fear of the Founders was that the Federal Government might grow into a Beast. They thought they had prevented that through the severe limitations, and balances of power, written within this "Federal Contract". The Constitution represents, therefore, more than anything else, a barrier to the Federal Government getting out of hand. That is why it is now basically ignored...or twisted into unrecognizable latitudes.

This recent contempt of the U.S. Constitution by the President, who is bound under its authority to gain Congressional approval for treaties, is only one of a series of scornful actions by the Executive Branch, including the ubiquitous mass of Federal Agencies. But it isn’t limited to the Executive, for the Judicial Branch has been contemptuous as well and the Legislative Branch has, for years, ignored both its fiscal and punitive Constitutional responsibilities.

We have before us an unbridled Federal Beast that sees itself as accountable to no one.

It has mired us in a hopeless and increasing debt. It has rendered the States irrelevant. It is dimming the rights of the People.

It is a Beast that must be tamed and must be tamed now.

[see today’s Truth Observed: Taming the Federal Beast]



Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.


To view comments or leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

Court Rules: Baker Can't Say No; ACLU Calls it a Proud Day
A few miles up the road from me, in Lakewood, CO, a baker is fighting for what he believes is morally right. Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, declined to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple in 2013. The gay couple, rather than respecting his beliefs, took him to the authorities, because this isn’t about getting a cake or flowers or photos, this is about forcing you to bow the knee or pay tribute. In this case, as well as the numerous ones flaring up around the country, the court is not only wrong, but it’s ruling is flawed. The argument is that Phillips “discriminated” against the couple and that he was in violation of Colorado’s anti-discrimination law because he was “picking and choosing customers based upon their sexual orientation”. But this is in error. Phillips openly stated that he “has no problem serving gay people”. It is the purpose for the cake that violates his conscience, not the buyer. I suspect that even if his mother had asked him to bake a cake for a gay wedding, he would have said no because of his Biblical convictions. This isn’t discriminating against someone for their sexual orientation. The ACLU lawyer stated “no one should be turned away from a shop or restaurant because of who they are or who they love.” This is a false argument, because, first, they weren’t “turned away” like someone in the past might have turned away an Indian, a black man, a Jew or an Irishman. Phillips said he would have been happy for them to order or buy anything else in the shop. They weren’t “turned away”, they were denied a specific request. And second, most importantly, they weren’t refused this request because of “who they were or who they love”. It had nothing to do with them, it had everything to do with what was on the cake and its purpose. If the gay couple had asked for a cake with "Happy Birthday" on it, he would have made it. If they had asked for "Congratulations, Graduate", he would have made that also. But when he is asked to use his God-given talents to produce or support that which he believes is morally wrong, he is bound, before God, to say no. If the gay couple had asked him to portray a gay sex act or if a black heterosexual couple had asked him to portray a heterosexual act, does he not have the right to refuse both on personal moral grounds? In the argument of our courts today, he is in violation of the law if he refuses either, for he would be considered discriminating against gays and blacks. Does anyone in their right mind think that a black couple who requested this would take the baker to court? Of course not. Just as I would not do so if I went to a baker requesting a cake for my pork luau, and the baker told me he was sorry, for he was Muslim, and he could not in good conscience, depict a pig. I would ask his forgiveness that I had requested this of him, thank him for his honesty, and then seek out another baker.  Now, if Phillips had stated that he wouldn’t serve gay people at all, then I wouldn’t be supporting him either, because, although I personally think he has a right to refuse service to anyone, I think it would be contrary to a Christian worldview to show partiality. There is a difference between “discrimination and partiality” and partiality is morally wrong. After the court ruling, the ACLU called it a “proud day”. No doubt there was “dancing in the streets” by some. But this is not a proud day. This is a solemn day...as other headlines trumpet the power of the courts over a florist in Washington, a photographer in New Mexico, county clerks in Kentucky and Tennessee, and another baker in Oregon, who is facing a $135,000 fine because it, too, violated her religious beliefs to support a gay wedding. Some have lost their shops; others are faced with losing their jobs, paying huge fines, and some…going to jail. A proud day? I don’t think so. I remember seeing pictures of people celebrating in the streets after 9-11. Some thought that was a proud day too. It wasn’t. I pray I will never celebrate knowing that someone else is grieving or losing something precious to them. Our President did this after the Supreme Court Oberfeldt ruling when he lit up the White House with rainbow colors while a large part of the nation was grieving. That was not a proud day, either. It was an unbecoming, "in your face" by a President. Christians should never do this. I suppose one may rationalize it on the football field, but in real life, we should be a people of compassion...resolute for truth and righteousness, but always gracious in victory. The courts and blue media and academia and Hollywood and much of civil government are aggressively against us...and against a Biblical worldview. It will most likely get even more difficult for us in the days ahead. But, despite this…there remains a huge remnant in the land. Take heart, take hope, take winsome and gracious, but firm, action. Pray, Remnant, Tuesdays Noon Eastern, for Revival and Repentance.
Abortion Industry Rights Trump Freedom of Speech
The actual headline was this: “Abortion Federation wins order halting video release”. It could have read as I wrote it above, but that would have been a shocker. As most of you know, the Center for Medical Progress has, for over a year, been doing a covert investigation of Planned Parenthood. Their investigation revealed that PP’s activities are consistent with those who are profiting from the selling of human baby parts after they are dismembered during an abortion. The investigation videotaped meetings with PP officials and inside the abortion clinics and they have been posting those videos online weekly. For those who have seen them, they are difficult to watch and make one’s soul sick as baby parts are handled and haggled over like oysters in a fish market. But, a federal judge in San Francisco has now blocked the release of any more videos in response to the Abortion Federation’s appeal declaring that they will suffer “harassment, intimidation, violence, invasion of property, and injury to reputation”. I will admit that, after seeing the videos, the reputation of Planned Parenthood has definitely been injured, but I'm shaking my head in disbelief about how quickly rights are eroding. I certainly could be wrong here, but it seems to me that if this were a “blue” group of investigative reporters doing a story on a “red” business, let’s say CNN covertly investigating the NRA, and the videos were as revealing as these have been, the blue media would have been in an uproar against the NRA, most likely to shut them down, arrest the lot, and throw away the key. They would have been like rabid sharks fueling a firestorm in the populace. Any attempts by the NRA to silence CNN would surely have been met with an injunction against the NRA for trying to suppress the freedom of speech. And, if by some strange chance a judge had ordered CNN to stop their reporting, the headline would have been like mine: "Gun Industry Judge Tramples Freedom of Speech"...if not something much more inflammatory. This incident, so quickly on the heels of other recent rulings, impresses me again with the danger of the Federal Judiciary. A sole Federal Judge wields awesome power…in this case, suspending someone's Constitutional rights. I believe we need, as part of a larger Balance of Powers Act, a constitutional amendment to force all Federal Judges to rule only within a Court and those rulings must be made only by a unanimous decision. This would effectively reduce the out-of-control power that currently exists within the Federal Judiciary. But, it is important for the remnant to keep in mind that we are in a world of blue media and blue judges and blue academia and blue Hollywood and blue…well, most all of the social powers are blue. So, this shouldn't surprise us. We have been floating for a long time and this is the consequence. We have a lot of work to do, yes, but don’t let these things pull your chain. Stay calm, stay cool, act wisely…but act.