Truth Encounter Community

If Jesus Rose from the Dead, then (#6) the Women Would Have Known It First

  2. Share
Truth Encounter Ministries
9 4

After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb. There was a violent earthquake, for an angel of the Lord came down from heaven and, going to the tomb, rolled back the stone and sat on it. His appearance was like lightning, and his clothes were white as snow. The guards were so afraid of him that they shook and became like dead men. The angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. He is not here; he has risen, just as he said. Come and see the place where he lay. (Matthew 28:1-6)

Jesus had a large following of women. We will try to unravel the confusion of their names shortly (there were a lot named “Mary”), although that is not our ultimate purpose here. Our purpose is to contemplate that it was the women who were the first to be told Jesus had risen from the dead and the first to see the risen Lord. In fact, according to the gospel records, the angels spoke to no one else except the women. And, it was the women who were given charge to inform the disciples.

This is remarkable, given the prevailing view toward women in the Jewish culture of that day. Although it pains me to go through it, consider the following: *

  • Josephus, in his “Antiquity of the Jews” under “The Polity Settled by Moses” states, “Let not the testimony of women be admitted, on account of the levity and boldness of their sex.” Although this rule is not in the Scripture, Josephus lists it as a rule from Moses that was being followed.
  • Consider this next one in light of the fact that the news of the resurrection was first given to, and only given to, women: A Rabbinical text (Sotah 19a) states “Sooner let the words of the Law be burnt than delivered to women.” Think just how stark this is! Let the words of the Law be burnt? How much more extreme could one get in order to show the disgust of the thought that God’s Word might be delivered to women?
  • Or this Rabbinical text (Kiddushin 82b): “Happy is he whose children are male, but unhappy is he whose children are female!” Imagine being a daughter living in a world like that.
  • And maybe most devastating of all we have the daily prayer of every Jewish man in which he ended with this benediction: “Blessed are you, Lord our God, ruler of the universe, who has not created me a woman.” (Berachos 60b)

Although this seems foreign to us now because Jesus changed all of this (although God’s Word never put women in this position), we need to understand the view toward women in that day in order to feel the weight of what God did at the resurrection. It is also important as a rebuttal to those who vainly try to posit that the resurrection was a myth created by the disciples. No Jewish male would write such a thing in which it was women who first heard the good news from the angels. And, that it was to the women that Jesus first showed Himself. This is unthinkable if one were making it all up. If you wanted to create a story in that culture to convince people Jesus rose from the dead, you wouldn’t make your key witnesses women.

But God did. And He did it in spades.

The gospel accounts tell us that there were many women who followed Jesus and ministered to Him. When He was crucified, they were standing by watching, and no doubt, grieving. From Matthew:

Many women were there, watching from a distance. They had followed Jesus from Galilee to care for his needs. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the mother of Zebedee’s sons. (Matthew 27:55-56)

From Mark:

There were also women looking on from a distance, among whom were Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses, and Salome (Mark 15:40)

And John tells us this:

Near the cross of Jesus stood his mother, his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. (John 19:25) 

Additionally, as we saw in our opening verses from Matthew:

Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb. (Matthew 28:1)

Matthew used this phrase, “the other Mary” earlier as he described Joseph burying Jesus:

 Mary Magdalene and the other Mary were there, sitting opposite the tomb (Matthew 27:61).

There are a lot of women named Mary in the gospel accounts!

It was a common name.

So, this brings us to some of the confusion, and sometimes a source of rebuttal regarding perceived contradictions in the account of the women: “which Mary are we talking about?” I’ll give you my take on how to gain some clarity on who is who.

The gospels record what appears to be five different women named Mary who are prominently mentioned in the crucifixion/burial/resurrection accounts:

  1. Mary, mother of Jesus (Matthew)
  2. Mary, wife of Clopas (John)
  3. Mary, mother of James and Joseph (Matthew, Mark, Luke)
  4. Mary Magdalene (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John)
  5. Mary, “the other Mary” (Matthew)

 

Number (1) Mary, the mother of Jesus, and (4) Mary Magdalene are easy for us to distinguish. It is the other three: (2) Mary, wife of Clopas; (4) Mary, mother of James and Joseph; and (5) “the other Mary” that need to be examined. I will tell you up front that I believe these are all the same person.

When Matthew and Mark tell us there were two women who saw where Jesus was laid, Matthew says it was Mary Magdalene and the “other Mary”. Mark states it is Mary Magdalene and the mother of Joses. This would lead us to believe that the “other Mary” is the mother of Joses. Do we have any other evidence of this? Yes. When Matthew, Mark and John tell us that there were women standing off looking at the crucifixion, it is clear Mary the mother of Jesus was there, Mary Magdalene was there, and Salome was there. Matthew just refers to her as “the mother of the sons of Zebedee”, whom we know to be Salome who asked Jesus for her sons, James and John, to sit at places of honor in the kingdom in Matthew 20:20-21. Mark just names her Salome. But there is a fourth woman there at the cross. Matthew calls her “the mother of James and Joseph” and Mark describes her as the mother of James the younger and Joses, which is another way to say Joseph. John, however, describes this fourth woman differently. Is this another woman or the same. I believe it is the same.

Let’s look again at what John records:

Near the cross of Jesus stood his mother, his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene (John 19:25). 

I believe you should read this as “Mary the wife of Clopas” being an appositive of “his mother’s sister”. This is the better understanding from the Greek, which gives the form x and y and z. There are only two conjunctions here.

When we put this all together we find that this fourth woman at the cross was Mary, the sister of Jesus’ mother, the wife of Clopas, and the mother of James and Joseph, sometimes called Joses. It may seem strange to have two sisters named Mary, but it is possible she was a half-sister.

So, we have three named Mary. We will internally rename them so that we don’t get confused:

  1. Mary, the mother of Jesus
  2. Aunt Mary, the sister of Jesus’ mother and therefore Jesus’ aunt; the wife of Clopas, the mother of James and Joseph
  3. Magdalene, Mary Magdalene

You can see, then, what John was faced with: 

“Near the cross of Jesus stood Mary, Mary and Mary."

If, for clarity, we use our temporary substitutions, we then have: 

“Near the cross of Jesus stood Mary, Aunt Mary and Magdalene.”

This makes so much sense for us, because there are consistently four women who are prominent in the larger resurrection narrative. When we use our substitutions, it makes it easier to understand and removes the contradictions. Who went to the tomb in Matthew 28:1? 

  • It was Magdalene and Aunt Mary.

Who followed Joseph of Arimathea to see where the body of Jesus was laid in Matthew 27:61 and Mark 15:47? 

  • Magdalene and Aunt Mary.

Who does Matthew and Mark list at the cross in Matthew 27:56 and Mark 15:40?

  • Magdalene, Aunt Mary and Salome

Who does Mark list as bringing spices to the tomb in Mark 16:1?

  • Magdalene, Aunt Mary and Salome  

Hopefully, that will help clear up some of the confusion when one comes to reading about the women and their part in the resurrection story. It may also give you a greater appreciation for Aunt Mary and her prevalent role.

But let’s now return to our purpose of the key role women played in the resurrection account. The women, first of all, were no small part of the life of Jesus. They were following Him from town to town and sacrificially providing for Him. Here is Luke’s account:

After this, Jesus traveled about from one town and village to another, proclaiming the good news of the kingdom of God. The Twelve were with him, and also some women who had been cured of evil spirits and diseases: Mary (called Magdalene) from whom seven demons had come out; Joanna the wife of Chuza, the manager of Herod’s household; Susanna; and many others. These women were helping to support them out of their own means. (Luke 8:1-3)

Here we find two more names: Joanna and Susanna. They are listed here because Jesus had cured them of demons and disease. Joanna is listed as one of the women who is found testifying of the risen Jesus to the skeptical disciples. (Luke 24:10)

We don’t know the background of Mary Magdalene. What we do know, however, is that Jesus healed her of seven demons, as we just read above. Whether the number seven is taken literally or figuratively, they had completely consumed her. But then Jesus touched her life and she was made whole. Her subsequent dedication to Him is found throughout His final days and resurrection.

If we follow John’s account: Mary Magdalene came early Sunday morning, while it was still dark, to the tomb. Was she doing what she had seen Jesus do countless times—seek the Father early in the mornings? No doubt she was still heavily grieving the loss of her Lord. Shockingly, the stone had been rolled away. She went into the tomb and found the Lord’s body gone. This must have been emotionally devastating to her. She was crushed. Her Lord had been savagely scourged, then crucified and put to death and buried in a tomb. And now, on top of all of that, someone had taken His body and violated his grave. She must have been in shock as she ran to tell Peter, who then, with John, ran to the tomb and also found it empty. The men returned home. No angel appeared to them.

But Magdalene, who had followed them, was left standing outside the tomb, weeping deeply. And as she wept, she stooped to look into the tomb again and saw two angels, one at the head where Jesus had lain and one at the feet. They asked her why she was weeping and she said that it was because they had taken away the Lord’s body and she didn’t know where it was. Poor Mary, so filled with grief, eyes so full of tears, a heart so deep in pain. Maybe this is why it appears as if she didn’t even recognized them as angels. Her world was turned upside down. Her heart, no doubt, was wrenched and her world in complete turmoil… until, someone behind her asked: “Who are you seeking?”

And then Jesus called her name. 

“Mary!”

And, for this woman, nothing would ever be the same again. Oh, what unspeakable joy! He was alive! He had conquered the grave!

The women were the first to know the tomb was empty. They were the first to see the risen Lord. They were second-class citizens. Of no account. But God blessed them mightily—the God who has a heart for the lowly and the outcast; the God who has compassion for the oppressed and the downtrodden. 

And this is the God who called your name. He is the One who called mine. And that is why, for those of us in Christ, nothing will ever be the same again.

Who are you seeking?

[previous] [next]

* Thanks to William Lane Craig, “Reasonable Faith”, for these quotes, page 367

Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.

Articles

Worldview Pieces

Comments

To view comments or leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

25
If Jesus Rose from the Dead, then (#1) the Seal Was Broken
We don’t spend much time talking about the seal that was placed upon the tomb, but I think it is significant. Here is the historical record: The next day, that is, after the day of Preparation, the chief priests and the Pharisees gathered before Pilate and said, “Sir, we remember how that impostor said, while he was still alive, ‘After three days I will rise.’ Therefore order the tomb to be made secure until the third day, lest his disciples go and steal him away and tell the people, ‘He has risen from the dead,’ and the last fraud will be worse than the first.” Pilate said to them, “You have a guard of soldiers. Go, make it as secure as you can.” So they went and made the tomb secure by sealing the stone and setting a guard. Matthew 27:62-66 The historical account states that the chief priests and the Pharisees “made the tomb secure by sealing the stone…”.  This seal was most likely several ropes that were drawn across the stone and then affixed to the tomb walls with a soft clay imprinted with some symbol of authority. It was also likely that the ropes were also sealed at their juncture in front of the stone. In this way, no one could move the stone or the ropes without breaking the dried clay and destroying the “seal” affixed upon the clay.  The seal was there to “put on notice” that no one was to mess with the tomb. Rome could deal quite nastily with those who did so. Now, this doesn’t mean much to us today, for we are long past the norm of using “seals” as they were utilized in ancient times. but in those days, a seal was inviolable[1]. It represented authority, authenticity, and finality. No one messed with a seal. In the book of Esther, when King Ahasuerus issued the order to save the Jews, he commanded them to “seal it with the king's ring, for an edict written in the name of the king and sealed with the king's ring cannot be revoked.” (Esther 8:8) When Daniel was thrown into the lion’s den, “… a stone was brought and laid on the mouth of the den, and the king sealed it with his own signet and with the signet of his lords, that nothing might be changed concerning Daniel." (Daniel 6:17) In the vision concerning the destruction of Jerusalem, the Scripture says this: And the vision of all this has become to you like the words of a book that is sealed. When men give it to one who can read, saying, “Read this,” he says, “I cannot, for it is sealed.” Isaiah 29:11 The permanence of a seal against all who were unauthorized to break it was an inviolable part of their world.  It becomes even more apparent when John is caught up to heaven and there beholds the scroll with seven seals. John begins to weep because there was “no one worthy to open the scroll or to look into it” (Revelation 5:4). Of course, we find that the Lamb, “standing as though it had been slain” (Revelation 5:6), was worthy to break the seals. And when each of those seals were broken, great calamity came upon the earth. Seals in the Scripture mean something. And John had wept, because the seal represented an inviolable wall to anyone who did not have the authority to break it. Seals show authority. They show authenticity. And they show finality for all except the one who had the authority to break them. And so, we now come back to the tomb. The seal, whether it was a Roman seal or the High Priest’s seal, represented a fixed closure that no one was allowed to breach. When it was set upon the tomb, there was a finality, a stamp of ultimate authority, that said, “this tomb is closed”. Ah, but God is not subject to the laws or seals of man. I can imagine that when the earth began to shake and the stone was rolled aside, that those clay seals with the authority of man impressed upon them broke into a thousand pieces and lay as trash littering the ground. If Jesus rose from the dead, then the seal of man, meant to keep Him in the grave, had been utterly and completely destroyed. But there is one more thing that must be mentioned regarding “seals”. It is important to note that God has given us this detail in the record to help substantiate the reality of the accounts of the empty tomb and the risen Lord Jesus. But it also brings our minds to something quite wonderful. In John 6:27, Jesus said this: Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him God the Father has set his seal.” If God seals something, it is sealed! In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, Ephesians 1:13 “… it is God who establishes us with you in Christ, and has anointed us, and who has also put his seal on us and given us his Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee. 2 Corinthians 1:21 This is God’s seal of authority, authenticity, and finality. You are His, sealed with His guarantee. Oh, my, dear brothers and sisters in Christ! How deep is the steadfast love of God that He should do such mighty things to secure us to Himself and then tell that He has put His own seal upon you and me. As David writes: “Such knowledge is too wonderful for me; it is high; I cannot attain it.” Psalm 139:6 [previous] [next]     [1]Inviolable /ĭn-vī′ə-lə-bəl/: never to be broken, infringed or dishonored; unassailable; secure from violation or assault or trespass
10
If Jesus Rose from the Dead, then... (#0)
The resurrection of Jesus Christ is the most important event in history. It is the most important truth claim in a biblical worldview. It is the key apologetic for Christianity. Over the next seven weeks, I would like for us to think through forty compelling arguments and implications that are true if Jesus, indeed, “rose from the dead”. This will take us through Ascension Day and Pentecost. Both are important days of remembrance following the Resurrection and we will highlight them. But more importantly, I want for us to see the tremendous significance of the Resurrection by looking at not only the many proofs, but also the many implications. And this, I pray, will lead to deep contemplations in our hearts and minds. Paul states that without the resurrection, our faith would be in vain and we would still be lost.  “… if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.”      1 Corinthians 15:17 This is not a minor statement, and it should cause us pause, for it puts this unique historical event into sharp perspective. Without the Resurrection, we are hopelessly lost. We are without a true faith and we are unforgiven, still condemned in our sins. We should probably read that verse over several times before plowing forward. It is easy for me, and possibly you, to treat Easter as another Christian holiday marked by multiple, and possibly extensive, preparations. Church choirs rehearse diligently and on overtime, special services are prepared (think Good Friday and sometimes Sunrise Services), thousands of lilies are tended and provoked to bloom at the right time and are purchased to line sanctuary rails, special meals are planned and prepared and joyously consumed, treasure hunts are created, painted eggs are hidden and Easter baskets are filled with chocolate bunnies, peeps, and who knows what else the market has, and will, come up with.  The point here is that just like Christmas and Thanksgiving and every other holiday, including birthdays, anniversaries, and the multitude of “take-your-boss-to-lunch” kind of days, they are preceded with much preparation, happy execution, and then forgotten except to toss the wrappings into the trash and press on with life as usual. When I was at the White House, the annual “Easter Egg Roll” on the south lawn was a big deal with weeks of preparation, followed immediately by a massive clean-up and the Secret Service hustling folks out of the “compound”. For the Resurrection, however, Paul implies that it is something so critical to our faith that it should be an ever-present reality. The astounding cry, “He lives!” should be ongoing, not a one-and-done holiday. I believe it is important for us to frequently ponder and meditate upon the deep implications that the tomb was really, truly empty and the resurrection of Jesus from the dead is absolutely true… a historical fact that has everyday implications. So, we will look at not only these implications, but also the apologetic propositions and the incredible truths that logically follow this unmatched historical assertion. We will not go through these in any particular order. We are not going from the least to the greatest or vice versa, although we will generally lay down the apologetic arguments first and then deal with the implications. And hopefully, after seven weeks, we will have imprinted these truths deep in our hearts such that they will help us with our walk into the darkness we call future. Because it is the Resurrection of Christ that stands at the forefront in the apologetic reality of who Jesus is and what God has done for us. As a famous hymn states: "Because He lives, I can face tomorrow." [Next: The Seal Was Broken]
Truth Encounter Community
Powered by Cause Machine. All rights reserved.