(#20) There Would Have Been an Early Resurrection Polemic

If Jesus Rose from the Dead, then (#20) There Would Have Been an Early Resurrection Polemic [audio]

There are two key formal elements in the argument concerning the resurrection of Jesus. The first is the “resurrection polemic” and the second is the “early resurrection creed”. Both had been fully developed in the very early days of Christianity. And both must be understood by the Christian seeking to defend the resurrection of Christ and understood well enough to articulate them. 

Today, we want to examine the first of these two: the “resurrection polemic[1]”. If you are unfamiliar with the word “polemic”, it would be fair to think of it as a verbal attack upon someone or something. It is usually used in the context of a verbal assault upon a particular group of people and often concerns a religious or political position. It comes from the Greek word polemikos (po’-lay-me-kos), which means “warlike, belligerent” and it gives you a sense that there is some strong emotion behind it. A polemic often involves not only the verbal attack, but the countering position, somewhat of a “point/counterpoint” as in a debate, except this is not a friendly debate. In the case of the resurrection polemic, we find that it was not just a temporary attack, but it had become cemented in the culture: “this story was widely spread among the Jews, and is to this day” (Matthew 28:15)

The historical record, therefore, informs us that this polemic regarding the resurrection of Jesus had formed extremely early. This is very important in our apologetic, for this polemic precludes the time necessary for a legend to arise. Legends can only form well after all of the eye-witnesses, and even secondary or tertiary generations, can provide a true account of what really happened. Plus, legends and myths don’t arise overnight, they need time to marinate, evolve and solidify.

There are a numerous passages of Scripture that we need to look at together. I encourage you to read them and begin to see them in the “point/counterpoint”, or better yet, a "point/attack" framework. 

Now on the next day, the day after the preparation, the chief priests and the Pharisees gathered together with Pilate, and said, “Sir, we remember that when He was still alive that deceiver said, ‘After three days I am to rise again.’ Therefore, give orders for the grave to be made secure until the third day, otherwise His disciples may come and steal Him away and say to the people, ‘He has risen from the dead,’ and the last deception will be worse than the first.” Pilate said to them, “You have a guard; go, make it as secure as you know how.” And they went and made the grave secure, and along with the guard they set a seal on the stone. (Matthew 27:62-66)

Here we see a portion of the polemic: the Jewish authorities are concerned that the disciples would formulate an argument that Jesus was the Messiah because He predicted His resurrection and had indeed risen. And, they would solidify their argument by stealing the body. The authorities moved to block that argument by posting the guard at the tomb.

But, things didn’t go as planned and three days later the soldiers appeared with, no doubt, strange stories about strange things happening at the tomb. And, they confessed, the tomb was, in fact,  empty.

 Now while they were on their way, some of the guard came into the city and reported to the chief priests all that had happened. And when they had assembled with the elders and consulted together, they gave a large sum of money to the soldiers, and said, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came by night and stole Him away while we were asleep.’ And if this should come to the governor’s ears, we will win him over and keep you out of trouble.” And they took the money and did as they had been instructed; and this story was widely spread among the Jews, and is to this day. (Matthew 28:11-15)

Here is the next stage of the polemic under construction. The authorities feared the disciples could now argue that Jesus had risen and point to the empty tomb, so they created a counterpoint that the disciples had stolen the body. And, then, if the disciples pointed out that a guard had been put in place to keep that from happening, they could counter that the guards had fallen asleep.

And so, we now have the heart of the polemic before us. 

However, it seems to me that the polemic really starts earlier than all of this:

Again the high priest was questioning Him, and saying to Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?” And Jesus said, “I am; and you shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven.” Tearing his clothes, the high priest said, “What further need do we have of witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy; how does it seem to you?” And they all condemned Him to be deserving of death. (Mark 14:61-64)

The true beginning of the argument is found in the claim of Jesus that He was the Messiah. His claims are much broader and deeper than that, but we will focus on this one for it is the key point in the passage above and in the polemic. The counterpoint/attack we see under development here from the Jewish authorities is that He is not the Messiah and to prove their counterpoint they would put Him to death. Which, of course, they did.

Summarizing the first point/counterpoint:

Point: Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God!

• Counterpoint: He is not. He was crucified and is now dead. End of story.

And, if three days later nothing had happened, it would have most certainly been the end of the argument. But, of course, something earthshaking happened instead. And now there was a new line in the polemic:

Point: Jesus rose from the dead!

• Counterpoint: His body is in the tomb.

Point: The tomb is empty.

• Counterpoint: The disciples stole the body.

Point: Soldiers were guarding the tomb.

• Counterpoint: They fell asleep.

Point: They were bribed to say that.

• Counterpoint: <silence>

The importance of going through all of this is to see that the attack and verbal argument began right at the time of the events of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus. And, maybe even more importantly, that it was recorded so near to the actual occurrences that the existence of the argument could have been refuted by anyone at the time they were written. This, again, is a grave blow to the notion that the resurrection of Jesus was a later mythical, legendary development.

What should be interesting to us, as well, is that this polemic is still with us today. For to declare: “Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, risen from the dead!” raises all of the counterpoints that we see from day one, plus many more that have been crafted over the years. We will look at those counterpoint theories soon, but first we need to understand the key importance of the early resurrection creed. We will do that next time.

[previous] [next]