If Jesus Rose from the Dead, then (#9) God Would Have Record the Numbers Inerrantly

  1. Share
9 3

On Day 8 we looked at the accusation that the resurrection accounts have contradictions regarding when the women came to the tomb—a contradiction of timing. Today we will deal with the contradictions of numbers. Charges have been understandably leveled at the Gospel accounts because of the conflict in how many women and angels were at the tomb.

Concerning the women were there one, two, three or five or more?

  • Matthew tells that two women came to the tomb that morning: “Now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the tomb.” (28:1)
  • Mark says three: “When the Sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James, and Salome bought spices, so that they might go and anoint him.” (16:1)
  • Luke says at least five women. He begins by speaking of “the women who had come with Him out of Galilee” (23:55) who had followed Joseph to see where Jesus’ body had been placed, and then refers to them on the resurrection morning as “they came to the tomb”. (24:1) He then refers to them in verses 2-9 as “they” and “the women”. Finally, in verse 10, he identifies them this way: “Now it was Mary Magdalene and Joanna and Mary the mother of James and the other women with them who told these things to the apostles…”. So, we have at least three identified by name plus “other women”, which has to be at least two or more.
  • John says it was only one: Magdalene (John 20:1)

Concerning the angels:

  • Matthew tells us there was only one angel whose appearance was like lightning and his garments “as white as snow”, and he was sitting on the stone (28:2-7).
  • Mark says it was just a “young man” in a white robe, sitting on the right, inside the tomb (16:5-7).
  • Luke says it was two “men”, in dazzling apparel, standing near the women (Luke 24:4).
  • John tells us something entirely different, for when Magdalene goes to the tomb, there were no angels or men or anyone inside or outside. It is only when she returns alone to the tomb after telling Peter and John that she looks again inside the tomb and sees: “… two angels in white, sitting where the body of Jesus had lain, one at the head and one at the feet” (John 20:12).

None of the four Gospels appears to agree. Do we have angels or men or just one young man? Do we have one or two, or initially no one at all? Were they outside or inside? Were they sitting on a stone, standing near the women, sitting on the right, or sitting at the head and feet where Jesus had lain?

The skeptic would say at this point, “Look, if the Bible can’t get the details right, then how can one trust it at all?” I've personally heard something like this numerous times.

So, let’s deal with these charges.

It is first extremely important to review some basics in how one comes to a text in order to understand what it is telling us. Academically, this is called “hermeneutics”—or the science of how to interpret biblical text. Rule nine is important for us here: 

          9. Historical narratives are always only a partial account.

What this means is that every historical narrative cannot record “everything”. Philip Schaff’s “History of the Christian Church” is massive—eight volumes. But he is covering 2,000 years and untold numbers of people, both cleric and non. Count up the number of hours in 2,000 years, or even days, and you will quickly realize that even in the best, and most extensive of historical narratives, the author must be highly and radically selective.

John writes this about the works of Jesus:

Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written. John 21:25

If this were true, then how selective must one be to write the life of Jesus into a few pages? And, not only that, but every historical author is selective based upon the purpose for which he is writing. The same is true for the gospels. They each have a purpose. I would say a divine purpose over which the Spirit of God is superintending. 

Let's begin our examination today with this understanding and its corollary:

          A partial historical record is not a false record

Armed with this and the naming conventions we devised earlier (Mary, Aunt Mary and Magdalene), let’s relook at the Gospel accounts:

Luke says there were at least five, maybe more women that came to the tomb. If Matthew, Mark and John only list two, three and one, respectively, this does not pose a contradiction. If John had used the words “Magdalene came alone to the tomb” then we would have some more work to do. But even then, that would be entirely possible.

Here is a scenario: Magdalene leaves early, while it is dark, she makes stops where the other women are staying, joining up with Aunt Mary, Salome, Joanne, and three more women (guessing), making a total of seven women (that sounds complete!) The point is, this is consistent with all four Gospel accounts because it is not incumbent upon the author to list everything. It is also possible, as they approached the tomb and the earthquake struck, that Magdalene broke free from the others and rushed to the tomb, got there first, saw it was empty and then ran to tell Peter and John. All of this is not only reasonable, but one of many scenarios that provide a logical answer to the critic.

Let’s now look at the angels at the tomb:

Again, it is not an inconsistency for an author to give us a record that tells of one angel speaking, when there might have been another present. That is his right to be selective. 

It is apparent, as well, that we are dealing with several different events. John tells us about Magdalene seeing angels after she has run to tell Peter and then comes back to the tomb. Her experience is different than that of the other women in Matthew, Mark and Luke. So, in looking at those three, Matthew tells us the angel descended and rolled back the stone and sat upon it. We have nothing in the text that demands he is still on the stone when he speaks to the women. It is most likely that his interaction with the women was after they had arrived and gone into the tomb, which would bring it in line with Mark and Luke—inside the tomb. This also is consistent with John’s account, because when Magdalene arrived, the angel appears to no longer be sitting on the stone.

So, we now only have the differing accounts of the “other” women and the angels inside the tomb. This, too, is not hard to reconcile, because if there are two, then there certainly is one. And the author could be directing us to simply the one who is speaking.

There is another scenario which would work as well. We are not compelled by the text to think that the women all came to the tomb in one big group. In fact, it is highly reasonable that they had arranged to meet each other there. This would lead us to understand that they arrived at the tomb at different times. Magdalene first, and possibly alone, who then runs to tell Peter. The second group arrives and they are met by angels. They run to tell the disciples as told. The third group arrives, they also interact with the angels and they leave, but tell no one because of their fear.

The point, here, is that there are numerous scenarios that do away with the charge of contradiction when it comes to the number of women and angels at the tomb.

And, as to the use of the word “men” to describe angels, in Acts, at the ascension of Christ, we find angels referred to as “men”. Probably because they appeared in human form:

They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. Acts 1:10

It seems like being dressed in white is a consistent description of angels! So, the “men” and the “young man” were all obviously angelic beings.

As we walk through this in an apologetic manner, let’s not forget what the message was. God was gracious to announce that glorious news to the women through His angelic creatures. But, it can get lost in the defense, though that defense is certainly not hard to make. It is the message they brought that should not be lost on us.

“Why do you look for the living among the dead? He is not here; he has risen!” Luke 24:5-6

He has risen, indeed!

[previous] [next]

Community tags

This content has 0 tags that match your profile.


To view comments or leave a comment, login or sign up.

Related Content

If Jesus Rose from the Dead, then (#1) the Seal Was Broken
We don’t spend much time talking about the seal that was placed upon the tomb, but I think it is significant. Here is the historical record: The next day, that is, after the day of Preparation, the chief priests and the Pharisees gathered before Pilate and said, “Sir, we remember how that impostor said, while he was still alive, ‘After three days I will rise.’ Therefore order the tomb to be made secure until the third day, lest his disciples go and steal him away and tell the people, ‘He has risen from the dead,’ and the last fraud will be worse than the first.” Pilate said to them, “You have a guard of soldiers. Go, make it as secure as you can.” So they went and made the tomb secure by sealing the stone and setting a guard. Matthew 27:62-66 The historical account states that the chief priests and the Pharisees “made the tomb secure by sealing the stone…”.  This seal was most likely several ropes that were drawn across the stone and then affixed to the tomb walls with a soft clay imprinted with some symbol of authority. It was also likely that the ropes were also sealed at their juncture in front of the stone. In this way, no one could move the stone or the ropes without breaking the dried clay and destroying the “seal” affixed upon the clay.  The seal was there to “put on notice” that no one was to mess with the tomb. Rome could deal quite nastily with those who did so. Now, this doesn’t mean much to us today, for we are long past the norm of using “seals” as they were utilized in ancient times. but in those days, a seal was inviolable[1]. It represented authority, authenticity, and finality. No one messed with a seal. In the book of Esther, when King Ahasuerus issued the order to save the Jews, he commanded them to “seal it with the king's ring, for an edict written in the name of the king and sealed with the king's ring cannot be revoked.” (Esther 8:8) When Daniel was thrown into the lion’s den, “… a stone was brought and laid on the mouth of the den, and the king sealed it with his own signet and with the signet of his lords, that nothing might be changed concerning Daniel." (Daniel 6:17) In the vision concerning the destruction of Jerusalem, the Scripture says this: And the vision of all this has become to you like the words of a book that is sealed. When men give it to one who can read, saying, “Read this,” he says, “I cannot, for it is sealed.” Isaiah 29:11 The permanence of a seal against all who were unauthorized to break it was an inviolable part of their world.  It becomes even more apparent when John is caught up to heaven and there beholds the scroll with seven seals. John begins to weep because there was “no one worthy to open the scroll or to look into it” (Revelation 5:4). Of course, we find that the Lamb, “standing as though it had been slain” (Revelation 5:6), was worthy to break the seals. And when each of those seals were broken, great calamity came upon the earth. Seals in the Scripture mean something. And John had wept, because the seal represented an inviolable wall to anyone who did not have the authority to break it. Seals show authority. They show authenticity. And they show finality for all except the one who had the authority to break them. And so, we now come back to the tomb. The seal, whether it was a Roman seal or the High Priest’s seal, represented a fixed closure that no one was allowed to breach. When it was set upon the tomb, there was a finality, a stamp of ultimate authority, that said, “this tomb is closed”. Ah, but God is not subject to the laws or seals of man. I can imagine that when the earth began to shake and the stone was rolled aside, that those clay seals with the authority of man impressed upon them broke into a thousand pieces and lay as trash littering the ground. If Jesus rose from the dead, then the seal of man, meant to keep Him in the grave, had been utterly and completely destroyed. But there is one more thing that must be mentioned regarding “seals”. It is important to note that God has given us this detail in the record to help substantiate the reality of the accounts of the empty tomb and the risen Lord Jesus. But it also brings our minds to something quite wonderful. In John 6:27, Jesus said this: Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him God the Father has set his seal.” If God seals something, it is sealed! In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, Ephesians 1:13 “… it is God who establishes us with you in Christ, and has anointed us, and who has also put his seal on us and given us his Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee. 2 Corinthians 1:21 This is God’s seal of authority, authenticity, and finality. You are His, sealed with His guarantee. Oh, my, dear brothers and sisters in Christ! How deep is the steadfast love of God that He should do such mighty things to secure us to Himself and then tell that He has put His own seal upon you and me. As David writes: “Such knowledge is too wonderful for me; it is high; I cannot attain it.” Psalm 139:6 [previous] [next]     [1]Inviolable /ĭn-vī′ə-lə-bəl/: never to be broken, infringed or dishonored; unassailable; secure from violation or assault or trespass
If Jesus Rose from the Dead, then... (#0)
The resurrection of Jesus Christ is the most important event in history. It is the most important truth claim in a biblical worldview. It is the key apologetic for Christianity. Over the next seven weeks, I would like for us to think through forty compelling arguments and implications that are true if Jesus, indeed, “rose from the dead”. This will take us through Ascension Day and Pentecost. Both are important days of remembrance following the Resurrection and we will highlight them. But more importantly, I want for us to see the tremendous significance of the Resurrection by looking at not only the many proofs, but also the many implications. And this, I pray, will lead to deep contemplations in our hearts and minds. Paul states that without the resurrection, our faith would be in vain and we would still be lost.  “… if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.”      1 Corinthians 15:17 This is not a minor statement, and it should cause us pause, for it puts this unique historical event into sharp perspective. Without the Resurrection, we are hopelessly lost. We are without a true faith and we are unforgiven, still condemned in our sins. We should probably read that verse over several times before plowing forward. It is easy for me, and possibly you, to treat Easter as another Christian holiday marked by multiple, and possibly extensive, preparations. Church choirs rehearse diligently and on overtime, special services are prepared (think Good Friday and sometimes Sunrise Services), thousands of lilies are tended and provoked to bloom at the right time and are purchased to line sanctuary rails, special meals are planned and prepared and joyously consumed, treasure hunts are created, painted eggs are hidden and Easter baskets are filled with chocolate bunnies, peeps, and who knows what else the market has, and will, come up with.  The point here is that just like Christmas and Thanksgiving and every other holiday, including birthdays, anniversaries, and the multitude of “take-your-boss-to-lunch” kind of days, they are preceded with much preparation, happy execution, and then forgotten except to toss the wrappings into the trash and press on with life as usual. When I was at the White House, the annual “Easter Egg Roll” on the south lawn was a big deal with weeks of preparation, followed immediately by a massive clean-up and the Secret Service hustling folks out of the “compound”. For the Resurrection, however, Paul implies that it is something so critical to our faith that it should be an ever-present reality. The astounding cry, “He lives!” should be ongoing, not a one-and-done holiday. I believe it is important for us to frequently ponder and meditate upon the deep implications that the tomb was really, truly empty and the resurrection of Jesus from the dead is absolutely true… a historical fact that has everyday implications. So, we will look at not only these implications, but also the apologetic propositions and the incredible truths that logically follow this unmatched historical assertion. We will not go through these in any particular order. We are not going from the least to the greatest or vice versa, although we will generally lay down the apologetic arguments first and then deal with the implications. And hopefully, after seven weeks, we will have imprinted these truths deep in our hearts such that they will help us with our walk into the darkness we call future. Because it is the Resurrection of Christ that stands at the forefront in the apologetic reality of who Jesus is and what God has done for us. As a famous hymn states: "Because He lives, I can face tomorrow." [Next: The Seal Was Broken]